Health Movement
Health Made Simple
Apps
Steps
Fitness, coming later
Facts over Fear Free Tools Programs Apparel Free Roadmap
The claim

“Raw milk is healthier than pasteurized milk.”

False
Evidence confidence Strong

Strong confidence because public-health reviews find no meaningful nutritional advantage from avoiding pasteurization, while outbreaks and microbiology evidence establish a substantially greater infection risk from raw milk.

The facts

Pasteurization does not meaningfully reduce milk’s nutritional quality, and raw milk has no established health advantage that offsets its higher risk of harmful germs.

The bigger picture

“Less processed” does not automatically mean safer or more nutritious. Pasteurization is a targeted safety step that kills pathogens with little effect on milk’s nutritional value.

Exposure Matters

Foodborne illness depends on whether harmful germs are present. One contaminated serving can be enough to make someone sick.

Who should be careful?

Safety note: Raw milk can carry Campylobacter, E. coli, Listeria, Brucella, Salmonella and other germs. Children under 5, adults over 65, pregnant people and people with weakened immune systems face higher risk of serious illness.

Talk to a healthcare professional if: Seek medical advice after raw-milk exposure if significant diarrhea, vomiting, fever or stomach cramps develop, especially in a higher-risk person.

What this means for you

Pasteurized milk provides the nutritional benefits of milk with much less infection risk.

Your next step

Choose pasteurized milk and dairy products and check the label when buying from farms or local markets.

Sources
Last reviewed 2026-10-01 Suggest a correction →

More Nutrition claims